High Court of KeralaCrl.Rev.Pet/737/2012dismissed

Alikutty v. Abdu Rahiman Haji

2015-03-19Honourable Mr.Justice C.T.Ravikumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/28TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 737 of 2012 () ------------------------------- CMP 3505/2011 of J.M.F.C.,TIRUR REVISION PETITIONER(S)/REVISION PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT:: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALIKUTTY, AGED 55 YEARS S/O MOIDEEN KOORIPARAMBIL (H) P.O. THIRUNAVAYA TIRUR TALUK. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.P.G.SURESH SMT.K.VIDYA MANUVILSAN SRI.RAJAN VISHNURAJ RESPONDENT(S)/REVISION RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. ABDU RAHIMAN HAJI, S/O KUNZHI MUHAMMED, UNNIYALUNGAL HOUSE, P.O.THIRUVANAVAYA, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. SAINUL ABIDEEN,, AGED 24 YEARS S/O. ABDU RAHIMAN HAJI, UNNIYALUNGAL (H), P.O. THIRUVANAVAYA, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

R1-R2 BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SEENA RAMAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 1903-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J.

--------------------------------------- Cr. R.P. No.737 of 2012 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March, 2015

ORDER

This revision petition is directed against the order in C.M.P. No.3505/2011 dated 19.12.2011 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - I, Tirur. As per the impugned order the learned Magistrate found that the complainant had not made any prima facie case against the accused and therefore there is no ground for proceed against the accused and consequently dismissed the complaint under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This matter was admitted on 13.06.2012. When this matter was taken for further consideration today, the learned counsel on both sides submitted that pending the revision petition the parties have amicably settled the matter and in the said circumstances, the revision petitioner did not wish to pursue the matter in further. In the said circumstances, recording the said submission, this revision petition is dismissed. C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE