← Library
High Court of KeralaCrl.MC/6971/2015dismissed

Prasheedkumar @ Unnikrishnan v. Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-10-30Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. KEMAL PASHA FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/8TH KARTHIKA,1937 Crl.MC.No. 6971 of 2015 () --------------------------- SC 190/2008 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT - I, KALPETTA ---------------- PETITIONER :

------------------ PRASHEEDKUMAR @ UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O.ARUMUGHAN, RESIDING AT ANDISSERY HOUSE, THOVARIMALA, NEMANI, AMBALAVAYAL, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW RESPONDENTS/STATE :-:

-----------------------------------

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SULTHAN BATHERY POLICE STATION, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

2. STATE OF KERALA, (RESPONDENTS 1 & 2), REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLICPROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. MAYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

Crl.MC.No. 6971 of 2015 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- A1:

TRUE COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN S.C.190/2008.

A2:

TRUE COPY OF THE RULING DATED 23.10.2013 ISSUED BY THE COURT OF 1ST INSTANCE AT THE STATE OF QATAR.

A3:

TRUE COPY ORDER DATED 26.03.2015 PASSED IN CRL.M.C.1978/2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE bp

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

================ Crl.M.C. No. 6971 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 30th day of October, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioner is the 2nd accused in S.C No.190/2008 of the Additional Sessions Court-I, Kalpetta, which is presently entered in the L.P register as L.P.No.7/2014. The said Sessions Case has arisen from Crime No.517/2005 of the Sulthan Battery Police Station. The petitioner along with the 1st accused stand charge sheeted for the offences under Sections 489 (B), 489(C), 420 and 120B IPC.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had deliberately handed over two counterfeit currency notes of the denomination of thousand to the 1st accused, knowing that the same were counterfeit currency notes. The 1st accused in turn, went to a bar and after consuming liquor, made an attempt to get the balance amount after making the payment through one of such counterfeit currency

Crl.M.C. No. 6971 of 2015 notes. He was caught red-handed, the investigation of which, pointed fingers to the present petitioner.

3. On going through the matter, this Court is satisfied that presently, there are no grounds to interfere with the matter in any manner. The petitioner is not entitled to get the proceedings in the case, quashed. Matters being so, this Crl.M.C is devoid of merits and is only to be dismissed and I do so.

In the result, this Crl.M.C is dismissed.

Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE stu