Sreekumar.V.K v. Narayanankutty
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/13TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 7059 of 2015 ---------------------------------- CC 1714/2013 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, HOSDRUG CRIME NO. 592/2013 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KASARGOD ..........
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
-------------------------------------- SREEKUMAR V.K., AGED 37 YEARS, S/O. KUNJIRAMAN, CHALINKAL , RAJEEVAM, PULOOR GRAMAM, KASARAGOD DIST BY ADV. SMT.MARY RANZOM LOUIZ RESPONDENT(S)/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT, COMPLAINANT & STATE: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. NARAYANANKUTTY, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. LATE RAMAN, RAM NIVAS, PUTHIYAKANDAM, AJANOOR GRAMAM, KASARAGOD DIST. - 671 531.
2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DIST. - 671 315.
3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH R2 & R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.MAYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
Crl.MC.No. 7059 of 2015 ---------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO 592/2013 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION DT. 8/5/2013.
ANNEXURE A2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CC NO 1714/2013 DT. 29/5/2013.
ANNEXURE A3 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:
NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
B. KEMAL PASHA, J.
................................................................ Crl.M.C. No. 7059 of 2015 ............................................................... Dated this the 4th day of November, 2015
O R D E R
Petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.1714/2013 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-I, Hosdurg, which has arisen from Crime No.592/2013 of Hosdurg Police Station, Kasaragod, for the offence punishable under Section 326 IPC.
2.
The allegation against the petitioner is that he has inflicted serious injuries on the head, forehead and face of the defacto complainant, by repeatedly cutting with a chopper. A grievous hurt has been caused.
3.
According to the petitioner, the defacto complainant/injured is his brother-in-law. The matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The defacto complainant has filed Annexure A3 affidavit affirming that the matter has been amicably settled between him and the
Crl.M.C. 7059 of 2015 -: 2 :- petitioner, and that he has no complaints against the petitioner.
Considering the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner and the series of offences involved, this Court is not in a position to accept and endorse the settlement arrived at between the parties. At the same time, the court below can take note of the settlement arrived at between the parties, take the case out of turn and dispose it of expeditiously.
With the above said observations, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of.
Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE ul/- [True copy] P.S. to Judge