Sajith @ Achu v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 7593 of 2015 () --------------------------- Bail Appl. 4784/15 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 14-09-2015 LP 44/2013 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE'S COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY CRIME NO. 778/2010 OF OACHIRA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:
-------------------------------------------- SAJITH @ ACHU, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O. SATHYADEVAN, MANJADITHARATHARAYIL VEETTIL, PULUMBITHEKKUMMURIYIL, PUTHUPALLY VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.VENUGOPAL NAME AND ADDRESS OF RESPONDENT:
------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031, FOR SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OACHIRA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 001.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.MAYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
DSV/10/12/15
Crl.MC.No. 7593 of 2015 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
----------------------- ANNEXURE A : COPY OF ORDER IN BA NO.4784/15 BY HON'BLE HIGH COURT DTD.14.9.2015.
ANNEXURE B : COPY OF COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY EMPLOYER OF PETITIONER "NASSER MASSAAD AL KHALDI GEN CONT, EST" DTD.31.10.2015.
ANNEXURE C : COPY OF CONFIRMATION OF TRAVEL AIR TICKET IN JET AIR WAYS DTD.7.12.2015.
ANNEXURE D : COPY OF RELEVANT PAGE OF PETITIONER'S INDIAN PASSPORT BEARING NO.HO 966770.
ANNEXURE E : COPY OF RESIDENCE PERMIT.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
----------------------- NIL // True Copy // P.A. To Judge DSV/10/12/15
B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
====================== Crl.M.C. No.7593 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 8th day of December, 2015
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is in dire need of his passport as he has to join his job abroad. It has come out that for a pretty long period, the petitioner was absconding. True, that he was abroad in connection with his employment.
3. The learned Public Prosecutor has pointed out that presently the trial has commenced and PWs 1 to 3 have already been examined. Let the trial be expedited. When the trial is going on, it is not proper to return the passport to the petitioner
Crl.M.C. No.7593 of 2015 to enable him to further abscond.
With a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and disposal, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed.
Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA JUDGE DSV/8/12/15 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge