Ajulal v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/22ND POUSHA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 6761 of 2014 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 785/2013 OF KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT -------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
-----------------------------------------
1. AJULAL, S/O.MADHUSOODANAPANICKER, AGED 30 YEARS, NANDANAM, POOCHEDIVILA, KATTAI CODE, KATTAKKADA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
2. SREEMATHY, W/O.MADHUSOODANAPANICKER, AGED 58 YEARS, NANDANAM, POOCHEDIVILA,KATTAI CODE, KATTAKKADA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
3. ANUSMITHA, D/O.MADHUSOODANAPANICKER,AGED 25 YEARS, NANDANAM, POOCHEDIVILA, KATTAI CODE, KATTAKKADA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & COMPLAINANT:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031
2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004
3. RENJITHA, AGED 26 YEARS, D/O.SULOCHANA, ORUMUGHATH PUTHEN VEEDU, VATTIYOORKAVU VILLAGE, PLAVODU P.O, KODUNGANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JIBU P. THOMAS R3 BY ADV. SRI.R.ARUN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts
Crl.MC.No. 6761 of 2014 () --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:
-------------------------------------------- ANNEX.A1 - CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.785 OF 2013 OF KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION.
ANNEX.A2 - COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:
NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No.6761 of 2014.
= = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 12th day of January, 2015.
O R D E R The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.785/2013 of Kattakkada Police Station registered for the offence under Section 498A IPC. The first petitioner is the husband of the 3rd respondent and the second petitioner is his mother and the third petitioner is his sister. It is submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and the proceedings in the criminal case may be quashed. 2.
Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioners and of the 3rd respondent and also the learned Public Prosecutor. 3.
The third respondent has appeared through a counsel and filed an affidavit to the effect that the matter has been settled and she has no objection to the proceedings in the criminal case being quashed. Having regard to the nature of the case I am satisfied that this is a fit case to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Section
Crl.M.C.No.6761/2014.
482 Cr.PC.
4.
In the result, this petition is allowed. The proceedings in Crime No.785/2013 of Kattakkada Police Station are quashed.
Sd/- K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, (Judge) Kvs/- ( true copy )