K.Pramod Kumar v. The J.F.C.M. Mattannur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/5TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 6794 of 2014 () --------------------------- CC 422/2014 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE'S COURT, THALASSERY PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:

----------------------- K.PRAMOD KUMAR, ADVOCATE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE:

-----------------------------

1. THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, MATTANNUR - 670 702

2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM - 682 031 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: DSV/28/10/15

Crl.MC.No. 6794 of 2014 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

----------------------- ANNX.I - COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY THE 1ST ACCUSED. ANNX.II - COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 29-4-13 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST ACCUSED BEFORE THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE. ANNX.III - COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16-5-2013 REGISTERING CMP NO.1921/13.

ANNX.IV - COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 25-7-2013 ISSUED BY THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE TO THE PETITIONER.

ANNX.V - COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 27-9-13 OF THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE'S COURT, THALASSERY.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

----------------------- NIL // True Copy // P.A. To Judge DSV/27/10/15

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

====================== Crl.M.C. No. 6794 of 2014 ======================= Dated this the 27th day of October, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioner is the 2nd accused in C.C.No.422 of 2014 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Thalassery, pending for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 120B, 199, 200, 419 and 465 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.

2. The proceedings were initiated on a complaint filed by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mattannur under Section 195(b) Cr.P.C.

3. On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on

Crl.M.C. No.6794 of 2014 going through the records, this Court is of the view that there is absolutely nothing to interfere with the matter at present. The present stage is too premature to consider the arguments put forwarded by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Matters being so, this Crl.M.C. is devoid of merits and is only to be dismissed and I do so.

In the result, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed.

Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA JUDGE DSV/27/10/15 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge