High Court of KeralaCrl.Rev.Pet/1815/2012dismissed

Salam @ Koyi Salam v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-04Honourable Mr. Justice B.Sudheendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/13TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1815 of 2012 () -------------------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P.2086/2012 IN S.C.27/2010 OF ADDL.SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC-II) KASARAGOD) REVISION PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 5: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. SALAM @ KOYI SALAM AGED 29 YEARS S/O.KADER @ ABDUL KADER, KALLURAVI, KANHANGAD VILLAGE KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 671 315.

2. NOUFAL P., AGED 23 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMED, PUTHIYAKANDOM HOUSE, KALLURAVI KANHANGAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 671 315.

3. SAVAD, AGED 23 YEARS S/O.SULAIMAN, KANDATHIL HOUSE, KALLURAVI KANHANGAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 671 315.

4. MAYYAK ISMAIL, AGED 25 YEARS S/O.KALLU IBRAHIM, KANDATHIL HOUSE, KALLURAVI KANHANGAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 671 315.

5. UMEER, AGED 23 YEARS S/O.USMN, FATHIMA QUARTERS, KALLURAVI KANHANGAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 671 315. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.HARISH RESPONDENT:

---------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SHRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - Crl.R.P. No.1815 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of November 2015

O R D E R

When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioners has submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Suffice it to say that, having gone through the order impugned, I do not find any reason to hold that the order impugned suffers from any infirmity, warranting interference by this Court. In the result, this revision petition stands dismissed. sd B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE dl/4.11.2015 // True Copy // PA to Judge