← Library
High Court of KeralaCrl.MC/6969/2014allowed

Rishan v. State Of Kerala

2015-01-14Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/24TH POUSHA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 6969 of 2014 ------------------------ IN CC 869/2013 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, MANJERI CRIME NO. 169/2013 OF KARUVARAKUNDU POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 & 3:

--------------------------

1. RISHAN, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.SAINUDHEEN, CHELANGARA HOUSE, KARUVARAKUNDU, PUTHANEZHI, PALLIPPADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. JABIR, AGED 27 YEARS, PALEPPADIYAN, EDAPPATTA AMSOM, PUTHANEZHI, PALLIPPADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENTS/STATE, DEFACTO COMPLAINANT & INJURED: ------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

2. ATHIKKADAN UNAISE, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.NAZER, ATHIKKADAN HOUSE, KARUVARAKUNDU AMSOM & DESOM, IRINGATTIRI P.O, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM.

3. ABDUL SATHAR, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED, ATHIKKADAN HOUSE, KARUVARAKUNDU AMSOM & DESOM, IRINGATTIRI, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM.

4. ATHIKKADEN NAZAR, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.MOOSA, ATHIKKADAN HOUSE, KARUVARAKUNDU AMSOM & DESOM, IRINGATTIRI P.O, NILAMBUR MALAPPURAM.

R2-4 BY ADV. SRI.M.DEVESH R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.P.MAYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 6969 of 2014 ------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:

------------------------ ANNEXURE 1- COPY OF THE FIR AND FIS IN KARUVARAKUNDU POLICE CRIME 169/2013.

ANNEXURE 2- COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED IN KARUVARAKUNDU POLICE CRIME 169/2013.

ANNEXURE 3- THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE 4- THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE 5- THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

----------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab

P.UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C No.6969 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of January, 2015 O R D E R The petitioners herein are the accused Nos.2 and 3 in C.C No.869/2013 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Manjeri. Crime in the said case was registered under Sections 341, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, on the complaint of one Unaise, that these petitioners and the first accused assaulted him and his friends Abdul Sathar and Nazar, and inflicted injuries on their body. The petitioners now seek orders quashing the prosecution as against them on the ground that they and the injured persons have amicably settled the dispute out of court. The first informant Unaise is the 2nd respondent herein, and the other injured persons are the respondents 3 and 4.

The respondents 2 to 4 have filed affidavit to the effect that they have settled the whole dispute with the accused, and they have no complaint or grievance now. I am well satisfied that there is a real and genuine settlement between the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 4.

Crl.M.C No.6969 of 2014 are mainly against the first accused, and as per the final report injuries were in fact inflicted with weapon by the first accused. Thus, I find that orders in favour of these petitioners will not affect the prosecution pending against the first accused. No doubt, the prosecution can proceed against the first accused, on the basis of the allegations mainly and practically made against him. When the dispute between these petitioners and the injured persons stands amicably settled, and when all the main allegations are against the first accused, the prosecution as against these petitioners can be closed.

In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed. The prosecution against the petitioners herein in C.C No.869/2013 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Manjeri, will stand quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, the petitioners will stand released from prosecution, and the bail bond, if any, executed by them will stand discharged.

P.UBAID JUDGE ab