Shafi Muhammed v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2015/11TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 7004 of 2014 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 654/2012 OF VALANCHERY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT ------------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED :
------------------------------------ SHAFI MUHAMMED, AGED 22 YEARS S/O.MOHAMMED, PARAPPIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKEKKARA VALANCHERRY POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH SRI.ARUN MATHEW VADAKKAN RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTING SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANCHERRY POLICE STATION, VALANCHERRY-676552 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. HAJIRA T.P., W/O.ABDUL HAMEED, THEKKEPEEDIYAKKAL HOUSE, POOKKATTIRI EDAYUR POST, VALANCHERRY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN-676552.
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JIBU P. THOMAS THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-
Crl.MC.No. 7004 of 2014 () ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
--------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1 :
TRUE COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT DT.6-11-2012 IN CRIME NO.654/2012 OF VALANCHERRY POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE A2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE IN CRIME NO. 654/12 OF VALANCHERRY POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A3 :
NOTARISED AFFIDAVIT DT. 7-11-2014 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ----------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn
B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No.7004 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of March 2015
ORDER
The accused 1 and 2 in C.C. No.3554/2013 of Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Tirur, which has arisen from Crime have come up under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, for getting all further proceedings in the above said case, quashed.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners had been engaged in disturbing the 16 year old daughter of the de-facto complainant, on her way to the school and back, for the period from June 2012 to 4th November 2012 and also abused her through her mobile phone.
3. According to the petitioners, the matter has been amicably
Crl.M.C.7004/2014 settled between them and the de-facto complainant and presently, the de-facto complainant has no complaint against the petitioners.
4. The de-facto complainant, who is the second respondent herein, has entered appearance and filed an affidavit affirming that all the disputes between them have been amicably settled. She has no complaints against the petitioners. She also has sought for getting the proceedings in the said case quashed.
5. When the matter has been settled amicably and when the second respondent has no complaints against the petitioners, I am of the view that there is no meaning in proceeding further in the matter and all proceedings in C.C. No.3554/2013 of Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Tirur, which has arisen from Crime can be quashed.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. All further proceedings in C.C. No.3554/2013 of Judicial First Class
Crl.M.C.7004/2014 Magistrate's Court, Tirur, which has arisen from Crime are quashed.
Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE dl // TRUE COPY // PA to Judge