C.V.Haridasan v. P.K.Purushothaman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3634 of 2006 (D) --------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN Crl.APPEAL 490/2005 of II ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, PALAKKAD DATED 01-09-2006 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 35/2003 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGAISTRATE-II,PALAKKAD DATED 17-10-2005.
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
------------------------------------------ C.V.HARIDASAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN @ VELLANDAN, CHOZHIYATHODY VEEDU, KANNAMPARIYARAM PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:
----------------------------
1. P.K.PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, SREE MEENAKSHI WOOD INDUSTRIES PATHIRIPALA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM.
R, BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. N. SURESH R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
acd
P.D. RAJAN, J.
------------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.3634 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2015
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the accused had surrendered in the trial Court on 21.11.2006 as per the judgment in Crl.Appeal No.490/2005 of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Palakkad and has undergone the sentence. Now he is not interested in prosecuting the matter further. In the circumstances, I have obtained a report from the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Palakkad, in which it is reported as follows:
"With reference to the above I may submit that the accused namely C.V. Haridasan, S/o. Velayudhan, Chozhiyathodi Veedu, Kannampariyaram, Palakkad involved in C.C.No.35/2003 on the file of this court (CRRP 3634/06 of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala) has surrendered before this Court on 21-11-2006 and
sent to jail for undergoing sentence as per the Hon'ble Sessions court order in Crl.A.490/05 dated 01-09-2006." In the light of the above report, I am of the opinion that after undergoing the sentence as directed in the judgment in Crl.Appeal No.490/2005 of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Palakkad, there is nothing to argue further in this case. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
P.D. RAJAN, JUDGE.
acd