Sreejith M.P. v. Droupathi C.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/22ND SRAVANA, 1937 CRP.No. 385 of 2015 () ----------------------- ARISING OUT OF E.P.NO.265/2011 IN OS 91/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, THALASSERY -------------------------------- REVISION PETITIONER(S)/JUDGMENT DEBTOR:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SREEJITH M.P.

MANAGER CHAITHANYA VOCATIONAL TRAINING CENTRE LOGANS ROAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR DIST.

BY ADV. SRI.P.BABU RESPONDENT(S)/DECREE HOLDER:

-------------------------------------------------------- DROUPATHI C.

W/O.K.N.SUBRAHMANIYAN, AGED 42 YEARS, USHA NIVAS, ERANHOLI AMSOM, DESOM THALASSERY THALUK, KANNUR DIST 670 001.

THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

CRP.No. 385 of 2015 () APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------- ANNEXURE-I-TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGED ISSUED FROM THE LAKESHORE HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM.

ANNEXURE-2-TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOL ISSUED FROM THE LAKESHORE HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------- R.AV //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

................................................................ C.R.P. No. 385 of 2015 ............................................................... Dated this the 13th day of August, 2015

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. Even though notice has been served on the respondent, there is no appearance for the respondent.

2.

On hearing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be permitted to pay off the EP amount by making the payment at the rate of ₹15,000/- per month and the first installment shall commence from 7-9-2015.

3.

In fact the impugned order is not liable to be interfered with, as it does not suffer from any illegality, irregularity or impropriety. The order shall survive and the

CRP 385 of 2015 -: 2 :- execution of the warrant shall stand stayed till the final payment as aforesaid is made. In case of default of any of the instalments, the order of stay will cease to exist and the warrant can be executed.

The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE ul/- [True copy] P.S. to Judge