High Court of KeralaCRP(WAKF)/303/2013dismissed as withdrawn

Saifudeen v. Chinnakada Muslim Jamath Palli

2015-11-09Honourable Mr.Justice Antony Dominic2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/18TH KARTHIKA, 1937 CRP(WAKF).No. 303 of 2013 ------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 8/2011 of WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOLLAM, DATED 31-03-2012 REVISION PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:

----------------------------------------------- SAIFUDEEN, AGED 43 YEARS, SON OF H.M.HANEEFA, ASRAMAM ROAD, KOLLAM EAST VILLAGE KOLLAM DISTRICT, H.M.HOUSE, SANTHI NAGAR 36.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAVINDRA NATH SRI.P.G.PRAMOD RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

-----------------------------------------

1. CHINNAKADA MUSLIM JAMATH PALLI CHINNAKADA, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT

2. A.A.SAMAD, AGED 77 YEARS, SON OF ABDUL LATEEF, RESIDING AT NEELAGIRI VEEDU HOUSE NO.45/940, CUTCHERY WARD, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PRESIDENT, CHINNAKADA MUSLIM JAMATH PALLI, CHINNAKADA, KOLLAM 691 578.

3. SHERIFF, SON OF SULAIMAN KUNJU, AGED 63 YEARS, RESIDING T.P.NAGARM 28 NEAR SIVANKOVIL, THAMARAKULAM WARD, KOLLAM VILLAGE, SECRETARY, CHINNAKADA MUSLIM JAMATH PALLI, CHINNAKADA, KOLLAM 691 578.

4. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KALOOR, KOCHI 680 017 R2 & 3 BY ADV. SRI.LAL K. JOSEPH R2 & 3 BY ADV. SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN R2 & 3 BY ADV. SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA R BY SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA, SC, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD THIS CRP (WAKF ACT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ANTONY DOMINIC & P.V.ASHA, JJ.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I.A.No.2855 of 2015 & C.R.P. No.303 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 9th day of November, 2015

ORDER

Antony Dominic, J.

Prayer in this I.A. is to permit the revision petitioner to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition without any prejudice to the right to file fresh C.R.P.

2. This prayer is not opposed by the counsel for respondents 2 and 3 and also the fourth respondent.

In such circumstances, this I.A. is allowed and C.R.P. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh CRP, if permissible under law. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE Sd/- P.V.ASHA JUDGE jes