Mohammed Haneefa v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 7469 of 2014 () --------------------------- IN SC 398/2010 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, MANJERI CRIME NO. 438/1999 OF TANUR POLICE STATION , MALAPPURAM PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.7:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- MOHAMMED HANEEFA AGED 38 YEARS S/O IMBICHI BAVA, CHERIAKATH HOUSE, THANUR P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRA KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/STATE:
-------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM-682031 (CIRM ENO.438/1999 OF THANUR POLICE STATION MALAPPAURAM DISTRICT.
R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. P. MAYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 7469 of 2014 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE I: COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE COURT OF SESSIONS MANJERI.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE sab
P.UBAID, J.
----------------------------- Crl. M.C No. 7469 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015.
O R D E R
The prayer in this proceeding brought under Section 482 Cr.P.C by the accused No.7 in S.C No.398/2010 before the first Additional Sessions Judge, Manjeri is essentially to direct adjournment of the trial, and the reason stated is that the petitioner wants sufficient time to engage a counsel of his choice. Now there is a report from the learned trial Judge that the trial stands adjourned to 19.1.2015. This report also shows that summons will have to be ordered to the witness afresh on 19.1.2015. The petitioner will thus get sufficient time to engage a counsel of his choice. In the above circumstances, this Crl.M.C need not proceed. It is accordingly closed.
P.UBAID, JUDGE sab