M.B.M Hotels(Pvt) Ltd v. P.Sukumaran Alias Puthalath Sukumaran
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/28TH SRAVANA, 1937 FAO.No. 92 of 2012 () ---------------------- (AGAINST ORDER IN I.A.NO.1524/2011 IN O.S.NO.165/2011 OF SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR DATED 28.09.2011) APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS :
----------------------------------------- 1.
M.B.M HOTELS(PVT) LTD., RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KANHANGAD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI. ASHRAF MALLAMBALAM MOOSA, AGED 42 YEARS S/O. LATE MOOSA, CRESCENT HOUSE, MANIKOTH P.O., AJANOOR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
2.
ASHRAF MALLAMBALAM MOOSA, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. LATE MOOSA, CRESCENT HOUSE, MANIKOTH P.O. AJANOOR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
3.
ABDUL BASHEER MALLAMBALAM MOOSA, AGED 40 YEARS S/O. LATE MOOSA, DIRECTOR, MBM HOTELS (PVT.)LTD.
KANHAGAD, RESIDING AT CRESCENT HOUSE, MANIKOTH P.O., AJANOOR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
4.
KADEEJA KOLAKKARA MOHAMADKUNHI, AGED 65 YEARS, W/O. LATE MOOSA, DIRECTOR, MBM HOTELS PVT. LTD.
KANHAGAD, RESIDING AT CRESCENT HOUSE, ATHINJAL, MANIKOTH P.O., AJANOOR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.K.SAIDALIKUTTY SRI.M.I.JOHNSON SRI.T.K.MOIDEEN KUTTY
FAO92/12 RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
-------------------------------------------------- P.SUKUMARAN ALIAS PUTHALATH SUKUMARAN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O. LATE CHINDAN NAMBIAR, REMA NIVAS, PILATHARA P.O. CHERUTHAZHAM AMSOM & DESOM, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 501.
BY ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & SUNIL THOMAS, JJ.
.................................................................... FAO No.92 of 2012 and C.M.Appl.No.230 of 2012 .................................................................... Dated this the 19th day of August, 2015.
J U D G M E N T
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.
It is submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the C.M.Application and the appeal are dismissed as infructuous.
(THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE) jg