High Court of KeralaCrl.Rev.Pet/530/2015disposed of

A.Saif v. State Of Kerala

2015-05-20Honourable Mr.Justice K.Harilal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2015/30TH VAISAKHA, 1937 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 530 of 2015 -------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.A.NO. 184/2013 of SESSIONS COURT,TRIVANDRUM DATED 07-10-2014.

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN ST 10/2012 of J.M.F.C.-III, NEDUMANGAD DATED 10-04-2013.

REVISION PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:

----------------------------------------- A.SAIF, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. ABOOBACKER, KADAVILAKATHU VEEDU, CHULLIMANOOR PO,, ANAD VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

--------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. E.HANEEFA (DIED), PROSECUTED BY SON. SHAHUL HAMEED, PROPRIETOR, HOTEL HINDUSTHAN, T.C.5/44, KOWDIAR WARD, KUDAPPANAKKUNNU VILLAGE, RESIDING AT AISWARAYA, K.P. 11/300, VATTYKONAM, KARAKULAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM R2 BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEVAN KURUKKUTTIYULLATHIL R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. N. SURESH THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

K. HARILAL, J.

------------------------------------------------------ Crl.R.P. No.530 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of May, 2015

ORDER

During the pendency of this revision filed against the conviction and sentence of the Revision Petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the parties have settled the matter and have filed Crl. M.A. No.2276/2015 to the effect that the matter has been compounded. The said petition has been signed by the Revision Petitioner as well as the 2nd respondent and their respective counsel. In the light of this, Crl.R.P. is disposed of and the judgments under appeal are set aside and the composition of the offence is recorded.

2. It is needless to mention that this composition shall have the effect of acquittal of the Revision Petitioner of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act within the meaning of Section 320(8) Cr.P.C.

Sd/- (K. HARILAL, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge