← Library
High Court of KeralaCrl.Rev.Pet/649/2015dismissed as not pressed

Anchayail Reghu v. Jayadevan

2015-10-07Honourable Mr. Justice B.Sudheendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 649 of 2015 () ------------------------------- C.M.P.NO.1593/15 & 2376/15 IN C.C.116/2012 REVISION PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED :

---------------------------------- ANCHAYAIL REGHU, S/O. SUKUMARAN, THOTTATHIL HOUSE BHARANIKAVU NORTH MURI, KATTANAM VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA.

BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE :

---------------------------------

1. JAYADEVAN S/O. KUNJUPANICKAN, PULIKKATHUSSERIL ANANDA BHAVAN KANDALLOOR SOUTH MURI, KANDALLOOR VILLAGE, KAYAMKULAM ALAPPUZHA-688 535.

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR R1 BY ADV. SMT.A.SALINI LAL R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: SCL.

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

------------------------------------- Crl. R.P. No.649 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2015.

ORDER

When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has submitted that this revision petition is not pressed.

2.

Suffice it to say that, having gone through the relevant inputs, I am satisfied that the order impugned does not suffer from any illegality, impropriety or incorrectness, warranting interference by this Court.

3.

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner has submitted that the revision petitioner is the principal of a college and hence the revision petitioner may be exempted from the personal appearance before the court below. 4.

Having regard to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the court below is directed to grant exemption to the revision petitioner from his personal appearance before the court below, except on days when his

Crl. R.P. No.649 of 2015 -2presence is necessary, if the petitioner files an application before the court below in this regard. I make it clear that the court below shall dispose of the complaint in accordance with law untrammeled by the observations made in this order. In the result, this revision petition stands dismissed. Sd/- B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR JUDGE Scl.

True Copy PA to Judge