Jameela K. v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/14TH ASWINA, 1937 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1239 of 2015 () ------------------------------ ORDER DATED 11-09-2015 IN CMP NO. 5853 OF 2015 IN STC 3285 OF 2014 CRIME NO. 658/2014 OF PAYANGADI POLICE STATION , KANNUR REVISION PETITIONER(S):

--------------------- JAMEELA K., D/O. MUHAMMEDKUNI, KOTTILAQNGADI, RAVANEESHWARAM POST, HOSDUR TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT BY ADV. SMT.REENA ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S):

---------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.

HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 31 2.

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PAYANGADI POLICE STATION, PAYYANNUR - 670 307 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S. SREEJITH THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

..................................................... Crl.R.P. No. 1239 of 2015 ..................................................... Dated this the 6th day of October, 2015

ORDER

When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has prayed for permitting him to withdraw this petition. The order challenged in this revision petition is the order passed by the court below under Sec. 451 Cr.P.C allowing the petitioner to receive the interim custody of vehicle bearing Reg. No. KL-18 2841 with some conditions. The said order is purely interlocutory in nature attracting the bar under Section 397 (2) Cr.P.C.

In the result, this Revision Petition stands dismissed as not maintainable. However, the dismissal of this Revision Petition will not take away the rights of the revision petitioner from seeking any remedy available to him under law. B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE.

Ani/ /true copy/ P.S. To Judge