E.P.Attakoya Thangal v. Sayed Shaikoya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/9TH ASWINA, 1937 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1985 of 2013 () -------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN F.NO.01/05/2013-SDO OF THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AMINI ISLAND REVISION PETITIONER/A PARTY :

----------------------------- E.P.ATTAKOYA THANGAL EAKKARAPALLY HOUSE, KAVARATTI ISLAND MUTAWALLI OF UJRA MOSQUE & MAKYHBARA, AMINI ISLAND. BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENTS/B.PARTY & EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE:

-------------------------------------------

1. SAYED SHAIKOYA PUTHIYA PADIPURA, S/O. THOOPIYAKAL KOYA, AMINI ISLAND PIN-682 552

2. THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AMINI ISLAND, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP PIN-682 552.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.S.ABDUL SAMMAD R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.D.BALAKRISHNA KARTHA R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR (SR.) R BY SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,SC,LAKSHADWEEP ADMN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-10-2015, ALONG WITH CRMC. 3566/2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.R.P. No. 1985 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of October, 2015

ORDER

When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Suffice it to say that having gone through the relevant inputs, I am satisfied that the order impugned does not suffer from any illegality, impropriety or incorrectness warranting interference by this Court.

In the result, this revision petition stands dismissed. Sd/- B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sm/