Leelavathy Amma v. P.Vijayakumari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/20TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1360 of 2014 () -------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.06.2014 IN CRL.M.P.NO.4098 OF 2011 IN C.C.NO.55 OF 2006 OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, MANJERI REVISION PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS 1 TO 3 & 5 TO 7: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. LEELAVATHY AMMA KEEZHEPATTU, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. DHARMAPALAN KEEZHEPATTU, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

3. KRISHNANUNNI KEEZHEPATTU, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

4. RUGMINI AMMA, KEEZHEPATTU, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

5. BALAKRISHNAN KEEZHEPATTU, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

6. MEENAKSHYKUTTY AMMA KEEZHEPATTU, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT & STATE: --------------------------------------------------------------

1. P.VIJAYAKUMARI D/O.PUNNADATH NARAYANAN, PUNNEDATH HOUSE, KEEZHMURI MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 322.

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI - 682 031.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.N.SURESH THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J.

======================== CRL.R.P.No.1360 OF 2014 ======================== Dated this the 11th day of March, 2015

ORDER

On 5.8.2014, when this matter came up for admission, notice on admission was issued to the first respondent. When this matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submitted that the petitioners did not wish to pursue with the revision petition any further and that the revision petition may be dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to take up all their contentions in defence in the calender case, appropriately at the appropriate stage. Recording the said submission, this revision petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge spc