High Court of KeralaCrl.Rev.Pet/1380/2014allowed

Ebrahim T.P. v. Biju P.

2015-06-19Honourable Mr.Justice K.Harilal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/29TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1380 of 2014 () -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.A 48/2014 of SESIONS COURT, KALPETTA DATED 05-06-2014 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN ST 3028/2005 of J.M.F.C ., KALPETTA DATED 02-12-2006 REVISION PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EBRAHIM T.P.

S/O.MOIDEEN, THAYYULLA PARAMBIL HOUSE, KALPATHUR P.O. MEPPAYOOR VIA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT AND STATE: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. BIJU P.

PUTHENVEETIL HOUSE, MEENANGADI POST, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673591.

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.SANIL KUMAR R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JIBU P.THOMAS THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

RAV

K. HARILAL, J.

--------------------------- Crl.R.P. No.1380 of 2014 --------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of June, 2015

ORDER

During the pendency of this revision filed against the conviction and sentence of the Revision Petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the parties have settled the matter and have filed Crl.M.A. No.2696/2015 to the effect that the matter has been compounded. The said petition has been signed by the Revision Petitioner as well as the first respondent and their respective counsel. In the light of this Crl.R.P. is disposed of and the judgments under appeal are set aside and the composition of the offence is recorded.

2. It is needless to mention that this composition shall have the effect of acquittal of the Revision Petitioner of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act within the meaning of Section 320(8) Cr.P.C.

K. HARILAL, JUDGE R.AV