← Library
High Court of KeralaCrl.Rev.Pet/3820/2008dismissed as not pressed

Leelamma Rajan v. Rajan Koshy And Others

2015-10-20Honourable Mr. Justice P.D.Rajan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/28TH ASWINA, 1937 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3820 of 2008 ( ) --------------------------------- CMP.NO.5366/2008 IN CC 2478/2006 of J.M.F.C.-I, KOLLAM DATED 10-09-2008 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REVISION PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :

------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEELAMMA RAJAN, D/O THANKAMMA, KITHAKKOTTIL HOUSE, EDAKKATTU VAYAL VILLAGE CHETHIKKODE P.O., ERNAKULAM.

BY ADVS.SMT.K.V.BHADRA KUMARI SRI.T.H.CHACKO SRI.K.SAJAN KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT(PETITIONERS 1&2 IN CMP AND ACCUSED 1&2 IN CC) : -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. RAJAN KOSHY, S/O KOSHY PANICAR, WEST END HOME, KUNDARA, NEAR HOSPITAL MUKKU, KATHIRAKKODE CHEARY, MULAVANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM DIST.

2. THANKAMMA KOSHY PANICKER, WEST END HOME, KUNDARA, KATHIRAKKODE CHEARY MULAVANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM DIST.

3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.B.GOPAKUMAR R1 & 2 BY ADV. SMT.CHINCY GOPAKUMAR R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP JOHN R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.N.SURESH THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VS

P.D.RAJAN, J.

----------------------------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.3820 of 2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of October, 2015

ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the disputes between the petitioner and the respondents are amicably settled and now the case is not pressed. She also filed a memo stating the above facts.

In the circumstances, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed.

P.D.RAJAN JUDGE vs