State Of Kerala v. Smt. Vilasini

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/24TH BHADRA, 1937 LA.App..No. 257 of 2013 () -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN LAR 136/2006 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOTTAYAM DATED 03-12-2011 APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:

--------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER R. PADMARAJ RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANT & ADDL.CLAIMANT 2:

------------------------------------------

1. SMT. VILASINI W/O.DAMODARAN, KIZHAKKEPARAMBIL KULASEKHARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, VAIKOM (DIED)

2. SATHYVRATHAN, S/O. VILASINI KIZHAKKEPARAMBIL, KULASEKHARAMANGALAM VILLAGE VAIKOM.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW PHILIP EDAPPALLIL THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 1509-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON & K. HARILAL, JJ.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L.A.A. No. 257 of 2013 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 15th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ramachandra Menon, J.

This appeal is against the judgment and decree dated 03.12.2011 in LAR No. 136 of 2003 of the Sub Court, Kottayam. When the matter came up for consideration on 10.09.2015, submission made across the Bar as to the fate of the similar proceedings was recorded. The said order reads as follows : "Learned counsel for the claimants submits the connected cases were remanded pursuant to the appeals preferred by the State and thereafter the matter was re-considered by the Reference Court and the same compensation was fixed again. Pursuant to the said verdict, the due amount has already been satisfied by the State in those cases and in respect of one case, it was settled in the Adalath proceedings enabling disbursement of the due amount as aforesaid.

The learned G.P. Seeks time to ascertain the position.

Post on 15.09.2015."

L.A.A. No. 257 of 2013 : 2 :

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submits that no appeal was preferred against LAR 127 of 2003 passed by the very same Court and that in the said circumstances similar matters were settled in adalath as pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the claimants. It is stated that in view of the turn of events as above, the matter is not pressed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE sd/- K. HARILAL, JUDGE kmd /True copy/ P.A. to Judge