State Of Kerala v. Pankajam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/16TH ASWINA, 1937 LA.App..No. 4 of 2014 () ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN LAR 294/2009 of II ADDL.SUB COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 28-02-2013 APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS IN LAR:
-----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,LA(GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY SRI.K.A.JALEEL, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL SRI. R. PADMARAJ, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT IN LAR:
-------------------------- PANKAJAM, D/O. BHAVANI, T.C.5/110 VIDYA BHAVAN, NEDUMBRA MURI, AMBALAMUKKU-695005.
BY ADV. SRI.HARIKUMAR THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OKB
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON & K. HARILAL, JJ.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L.A.A.No.4 of 2014 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Dated this the 8th day of October, 2015.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandra Menon, J.
This appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2013 in LAR No.294/2009 of the II Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. Pursuant to the 4(1) notification dated 11.06.2007 the land value was fixed as Rs.5,84,054/- per Are by the awarding officer, which, in turn, was enhanced on reference as Rs.26,40,000/- per Are based on the fixation of land value in LAR No.711/2008. This is sought to be challenged stating that the same is exorbitant.
2. Heard both the sides.
3. During the course of hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that exactly similar matter had already come up for consideration before this Court vide LAA No.351/2013, whereby the land value of similar land was fixed by this Court as Rs.28,00,000/-
LAA.4/14 :2: per Are. Considering the same, it is seen that the land value fixed by the reference court in the instant case is well within limits. As such, no interference is warranted in this appeal and the same stands dismissed accordingly.
Sd/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE Sd/- K. HARILAL, JUDGE okb.