Sri.Chacko Thomas v. Aniyamma Jose

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937 R.F.A.No. 410 of 2004 (E) AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN O.S.7/1999 of DIST & SESSIONS COURT, ALAPPUZHA DATED 09-02-2004 APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 1, 2, 3 AND 5:

1. SRI.CHACKO THOMAS, PANCHARAYIL HOUSE, NEAR ANAND ASHRAM, CHANGANACHERRY. (DIED)

2. CHECHAMMA ANTONY, KAVALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KONTHURUTHY, THEVARA,ERNAKULAM.

3. ACHAMMA CHACKO, THURUTHUMALIL, VILLOONNI, ARPPOOKARA P.O. MANNANAM.

4. THANKAMMA OOMMEN, NEDUMPARAYIL HOUSE, VILLOONNI, ARPOOKARA. ADDL.A5.THANKAMMA THOMAS, W/O CHACKO THOMAS, PANCHARAYIL HOUSE, NEAR ANAND ASHRAM, CHANGANACHERRY ADDL.A6.ANISAMMA CHERIAN, D/O CHACKO THOMAS, PANCHARAYIL HOUSE, NEAR ANAND ASHRAM, CHANGANACHERRY ADDL.A7.CHACKO THOMAS, S/O CHACKO THOMAS, PANCHARAYIL HOUSE, NEAR ANAND ASHRAM, CHANGANACHERRY ADDL.A8.VAKACHAN THOMAS, S/O CHACKO THOMAS, PANCHARAYIL HOUSE, NEAR ANAND ASHRAM, CHANGANACHERRY ADDL.A9.MARIA SUNNY SEBASTIAN, D/O CHACKO THOMAS, PANCHARAYIL HOUSE, NEAR ANAND ASHRAM, CHANGANACHERRY (Additional appellants 5 to 9 impleaded as the legal heirs of the deceased first appellant vide order dated 7.9.2007 in I.A.No.3248/07) BY ADVS.SRI.SABU GEORGE SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS AND 4TH DEFENDANT:

1. ANIYAMMA JOSE, KANAKAMANGALAM, VELIYANADU, KUTTANAD.

2. JOSE CHACKO, DO. DO.

3. JOSE MATHEW, DO. DO.

4. JOSE K. JOSE, DO. DO.

5. NANCY JOJO, DO. DO.

6. THRESSIAMMA DEVASIA, KURISUMMOOTTIL, ANAKALY, KANJIRAPPALLY. R,1,2,3,4,5. BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) R,R1,R2,R4,R5. BY ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR R,R15 BY ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN R,R15 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE MATHEW R,R15 BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G R1 TO R5 BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN R3 BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE R3 BY ADV. SRI.G.MANU KRISHNAN THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ANTONY DOMINIC & P.V.ASHA, JJ.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.F.A.No.410 of 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

Antony Dominic, J.

Counsel for the appellant states that following the death of the 10th respondent though the appellants were instructed to furnish the details of the legal heirs of the tenth respondent, such details have not been furnished till date. In such circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

SD/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE SD/- P.V.ASHA JUDGE jes