High Court of KeralaMat.Appeal/908/2015dismissed for default

Basil Varghese v. Bincy K. Skaria

2015-09-16Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937 Mat.Appeal.No. 908 of 2015 () ------------------------------ (AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 253/2013 of FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 09.07.2015) APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. BASIL VARGHESE AGED 35 YEARS S/O.P.I.VARGHESE, RESIDING AT PAZHUKKUDI HOUSE KOTHAMANGALAM P.O. RAMALLOOR THADATHIKAVALA KARA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. P.I.VARGHESE @ IYPE VARKEY AGED 64 YEARS S/O.IYPE, RESIDING AT PAZHUKKUDI HOUSE KOTHAMANGALAM P.O. RAMALLOOR THADATHIKAVALA KARA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

3. SARAKUTTY AGED 54 YEARS W/O.P.I.VARGHESE, RESIDING AT PAZHUKKUDI HOUSE KOTHAMANGALAM P.O. RAMALLOOR THADATHIKAVALA KARA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & 4TH RESPONDENT:

-------------------------------------------

1. BINCY K. SKARIA, AGED 29 YEARS D/O.SKARIA K.P., KANNIKKATTIL HOUSE SOUTH MAZHUVANNOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. SINI VARGHESE, AGED 37 YEARS W/O.JOBY ISSAC, RESIDING AT PAZHUKKUDI HOUSE KOTHAMANGALAM P.O. RAMALLOOR THADATHIKAVALAKARA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

CAVEATOR BY ADV. SRI.K.S..ARUN KUMAR THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON & K. HARILAL, JJ.

.............................................................................. MAT APPEAL No.908 OF 2015 ......................................................................... Dated this the 16th September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

P.R. Ramachandra Menon, J.

The appeal arises from the verdict dated 09.07.2015 passed by the Family Court, Muvattupuzha in O.P.No.253 of 2013. The first respondent has already moved this Court by filing Caveat No.873 of 2015. When the matter came up for consideration before this Court on 14.09.2015, there was no representation for the appellant and hence it was adjourned to this date. The position remains to be the same today as well. There is nobody to represent the appellants. It appears that the appeallants have lost interest in the cause of action projected in this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed for default.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE K. HARILAL, JUDGE lk