← Library
High Court of KeralaMat.Appeal/800/2013dismissed as withdrawn

Jagan G.Nath v. Parvathy Raveendran

2015-03-20Honourable Mr.Justice K.T.Sankaran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Mat.Appeal.No. 800 of 2013 () ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP.NO.595/2012 of FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD DATED 05-09-2013.

APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT:

------------------------ JAGAN G.NATH, S/O.GOPINATHAN, CODE NO.6816, OUTFIT DEPARTMENT, CADS PROJECT, COCHIN SHIPYARD LIMITED, COCHIN-15. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:

------------------------- PARVATHY RAVEENDRAN, D/O.RAVEENDRAN, HARIMURALI, PNRA-F-12A, SRIKRISHNA LANE, AMBALAMUKKU, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695003.

BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN ADV. SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

K.T. SANKARAN & K. HARILAL, JJ.

--------------------------------------------------------- Mat. Appeal No.800 of 2013 ---------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

Sankaran, J.

The respondent filed O.P.No.595 of 2012 on the file of the Family Court, Nedumangad, against the appellant for dissolution of marriage and recovery of money. The Family Court allowed the Original Petition and passed a decree dissolving the marriage between the appellant and the respondent, which is under challenge in this Mat. Appeal.

2. The appellant filed a memo dated 6/3/2015 stating that though the matter was referred for mediation, it was not settled and that there is no chance for re-union. It is prayed that the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the Mat. Appeal.

Accordingly, this Mat. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- (K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE) Sd/- (K. HARILAL, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge