High Court of KeralaRSA/670/2004dismissed for default

Vijayakumar v. Kavungal Mini

2015-06-23Honourable Mr. Justice P.B.Suresh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/2ND ASHADHA, 1937 RSA.No. 670 of 2004 ------------------------ AS 33/1997 OF DISTRICT COURT, MANJERI.

OS 165/1993 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR.

..........

APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS 2 & 3:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

1. VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O. DECEASED KANATTIL PADMANABHAN NAIR, KERALADEESWARAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK.

2. SUMANGALA, D/O. DECEASED KANATTIL PADMANABHAN NAIR, KERALADEESWARAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK.

BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SENIOR ADVOCATE) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/1ST PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. KAVUNGAL MINI, D/O. DECEASED KANATTIL PADMANABHAN NAIR, KERALADEESWARAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK.

2. KANATTIL NARAYANAN @ APPUKUTTAN NAIR, NIRAMARUTHUR AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR.

3. SARADA AMMA, NIRAMARUTHUR AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK.

4. SOUDAMINI AMMA, W/O. DECEASED KANATTIL PADMANABHAN NAIR, KERALADEESWARAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK.

R2 BY ADVS. SRI.BIJU ABRAHAM SRI.B.G.BHASKAR R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.

----------------------------------- R.S.A.No.670 of 2004 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is seen that the second respondent died on 13.3.2011 and the fourth respondent died on 13.7.2000. The legal representatives of the said respondents are not seen brought on record. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that though the appellants were called upon to give instructions to pursue this appeal, through registered notices, there is no response from them.

In the said circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for default. All the interlocutory applications in the appeal are closed. P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

smm