Cherukudi Mattuvayal Suresh Babu v. Koyappurath Kuniyil Bhaskaran
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/5TH ASHADHA, 1937 RSA.No. 685 of 2004 ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 12/2001 of DISTRICT COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 20-10-2003 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 91/1997 of I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 29-02-2000 APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
----------------------------------------------------- CHERUKUDI MATTUVAYAL SURESH BABU, S/O. CHANDAPPAN, RESIDING AT ELATHUR AMSOM, DESOM KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. KOYAPPURATH KUNIYIL BHASKARAN, S/O. CHANDAPPAN, RESIDING AT THALAKULATHUR AMSOM, DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
2. POOKKATTU GOPINATHAN, S/O. BALAKRISHNAN, KARANTHOOR AMSOM, DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
3. PAKKUVEETTIL SATHEESH KUMAR, S/O. DIVAKARAN, RESIDING AT KACHERI AMSOM, DESOM KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
4. KOYAPPURATH KUNIYIL THANKAMANI, THALAKULATHOOR AMSOM, DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
5. SIVAKUMARI, RESIDING AT POOKATTU VEEDU, KARANTHOOR AMSOM, DESOM KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
6. SHOBA, W/O. V.K. RAMACHANDRAN, POOKKATTU VEEDU, RESIDING AT KOOTHUPARAMBA, AMSOM DESOM, TALASSERI TALUK.
7. LATHA, W/O. MANATHANATH, VARATTODI RATNAKARAN, THALAKULASTHOOR AMSOM, DESOM KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
R1 TO R7 BY ADVS. SRI.A.K.SRINIVASAN SRI.N.S.MOHAMMED USMAN SRI.A.S.BENOY THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AS
A.HARIPRASAD, J.
------------------------------------------------ R.S.A.No.685 of 2004 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents.
2.
I have perused the memo dated 16.06.2015. It is stated that the subject matter of the appeal have been compromised between the parties out of court. Hence, the appeal is not prosecuted.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.
AS