Raveendran v. Sunitha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/29TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Mat.Appeal.No. 814 of 2010 ( ) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 1087/2009 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM DATED 20-05-2010 APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT:

---------------------------------------------- RAVEENDRAN,S/O.KRISHNAN,AMBALADATH HOUSE, CHOORAKODU, VALLAPPUZHA-PO OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.VENUGOPAL (1086/92) RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:

-------------------------------------------------- SUNITHA,D/O.AYYAPPAN,KAVUMPURATH HOUSE, CHERUKARA.P.O, ELAMKULAM AMSOM, CHERUKARA DESOM PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

R, BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.

THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

C.K.ABDUL REHIM & MARY JOSEPH, JJ.

----------------------------------------- Mat Appeal. No. 814 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

Abdul Rehim,J.

This appeal arises from a decree passed by the Family Court, Malappuram in OP.No.1087/2009, allowing a claim of the respondent herein for return of money and gold ornaments. The appellant is the respondent before the court below.

2. During pendency of the appeal the case was referred to the Ernakulam Mediation Centre for exploring possibility of a mediation settlement. A report submitted by the Mediator, dated 11.11.2015, would indicate that the parties have settled the disputes in the mediation and a 'Memorandum of Agreement' drawn under section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure was signed by both the parties and their respective counsel. A copy of the 'Memorandum of Agreement' is forwarded along with the report of the Mediator. It is revealed that the entire disputes involved in this appeal is settled by the appellant by paying a sum of

MA.814/2010 Rs.2,50,000/- to the respondent, towards full and final settlement of all her claims, except the claim for maintenance. Both parties have agreed that the appeal can be settled and disposed of on the basis of acceptance of the said amount by the respondent and on the basis of the settlement entered as above.

3. Therefore the above Mat. Appeal is hereby disposed of by setting aside the impugned judgment of the Family Court and on recording the settlement as mentioned above. The original petition before the Family Court will stand disposed of in accordance with the settlement.

4. The 'Memorandum of Agreement' produced along with the report of the Mediator will form part of this judgment. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE MARY JOSEPH, JUDGE Pmn/

MA.814/2010