C.Padmakshy v. R.Raguvaran

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2013/12TH ASWINA, 1935 Mat.Appeal.No. 1055 of 2010 ( ) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 913/1997 of FAMILY COURT,TRIVANDRUM DATED 15-02-2005 APPELLANT/PETITIONER::

---------------------------------------- PADMAKSHY, D/O.AYYAPPAN, AGED 59 YEARS, TP.NO.1/626, VRINDAVANAM, PACHALLOOR P.O.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA SMT.S.MEERA SMT.M.G.AISHWARYA RESPONDENT(S)/COUNTER PETITIONER::

-------------------------------------------------------------------- R.RAGHUVARAN, S/O.PONNU, USHA BHAVAN, T.P.NO.IX/99A, MULLUVILA VEEDU, PACHALLOOR P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695 027.

THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-10-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: acd

ANTONY DOMINIC & P.D. RAJAN, JJ.

------------------------------------------- C.M.A.No.3514/2010 & Mat. Appeal No.1055 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of October, 2013

JUDGMENT

ANTONY DOMINIC,J.

Despite opportunity given to cure the defect, defect has not been cured and the service of notice to the respondent remains incomplete.

Today, when the matter was taken up, there was no representation for the petitioner/appellant also. In such circumstances, the petition is dismissed. The appeal will also stand dismissed for non-prosecution.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE P.D. RAJAN, JUDGE.

acd