High Court of KeralaMACA/2273/2013dismissed as not pressed

National Insurance Co.Ltd v. Jayasree

2015-11-24Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon,Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937 MACA.No. 2273 of 2013 () ------------------------- AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 572/2007 of ADDL.D.C. & MACT, NORTH PARAVUR DATED 10-06-2013 APPELLANT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT IN THE O.P:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD NORTH PARAVUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD, KOCHI REGIONALOFFICE OMANA BUILDING, PADMA JUNCTION, KOCHI - 35.

BY ADV. SRI.A.R.GEORGE RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANTS 1 & 2 IN THE O.P:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. JAYASREE W/O.DILEEP, SUDHA NIVAS, THEVARA - 682 013

2. DIYA (MINOR) REPRESENTED THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN - JAYASREE W/O.DILEEP, SUDHA NIVAS, THEVARA - 682 013 R-R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.REJI GEORGE R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.GOPAKUMAR G. (ALUVA) R1 & 2 BY ADV. SMT.ANUPAMA JOHNY R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.UMESH.N.PAI R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.BINOY DAVIS THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

avk

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON & ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JJ.

-------------------------------------- M.A.C.A.No.2273 of 2013 & C.0.No.154 of 2015 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

This cross objection has been preferred in M.A.C.A.No.2273 of which is still to be admitted. 2.

The factual position revealed from the proceeding is that the insurance company who is the appellant in M.A.C.A.2273 of 2015 is stated as aggrieved by the award dated 10.6.2013 passed by the Tribunal, whereby the liability has been mulcted upon the shoulders of the said company. Since the above appeal is not admitted, the cross objection is not maintainable; submits the learned counsel appearing for the appellant Insurance Company. It is also added by the learned counsel that, in view of the subsequent development, the appellant company is not intending to press the matter. Accordingly this appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. As a natural consequence, the cross objection also stands dismissed accordingly.

Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE Sd/- ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE avk