Remany Kumari & Others v. P.Madhusoodhanan Pillai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/20TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Mat.Appeal.No. 562 of 2008 ( ) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 653/2005 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA DATED 22-06-2006 APPELLANT(S)/PLAINTIFFS:

--------------------------

1. REMANY KUMARI, AGED 45, W/O.MADHUSOODHANAN PILLAI, ASWATHY VILLA, KURIYODE CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM.

2. ANOOP, AGED 19, S/O.MADHUSOODHANAN PILLAI, ASWATHY VILLA, KURIYODE CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM.

3. ASWATHY, AGED 16, D/O.MADHUSOODHANAN PILLAI, ASWATHY VILLA, KURIYODE CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM.

REP BY MOTHER REMANY KUMARI & IST APPELLANT.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) SRI.P.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANT:

-------------------------- P.MADHUSOODHANAN PILLAI, PINATTINMOTTIL, KURIYODU, CHADAYAMANGALAM KOLLAM.

SRI. GOKULDAS V.V.

THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

acd

V.K. MOHANAN & P.D. RAJAN, JJ.

------------------------------------------- Mat.Appeal No. 562 of 2008 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

V.K.Mohanan,J.

Though the above case was specifically posted in the 'special list', after pre-publication of a draft list to ascertain whether the parties are ready for mediation or not, there is no representation either for the appellants or for the respondent. Accordingly, the above appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

V.K. MOHANAN, JUDGE.

P.D. RAJAN, JUDGE.

acd