K.Damodaran v. P.Uthaman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936 RP.No. 1056 of 2006 (W) IN OP.28333/2000 ------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 28333/2000 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 25.05.2006 REVIEW PETITIONER/4TH RESPONDENT IN THE O.P. : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.DAMODARAN, S/O.KUNHAPPA AGED 55 YEARS, KOVVAMMAL HOUSE, MATHIL THAVAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND OTHER RESPONDENTS IN THE O.P. : --------------------------------------------------

1. P.UTHAMAN, S/O.NARAYANAN MUTTEL, THAVAM P.O., CHERUKANNU KANNUR.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. PANCHAYATHS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, KANNUR DISTRICT.

4. THE SECRETARY, CHERUKANNUR PANCHAYATH, KANNUR.

R BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.E.M.ABDUL KHADER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

AV

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

------------------------------------ R.P.No.1056 of 2006 in O.P.No.28333 of 2000 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015

O R D E R

No representation for the petitioner. The matter is posted before me in the defect list. Though notice in this case was ordered on 30.11.2006, notice has not been sent for the reason that, no steps have been taken. I notice that, time was granted on 28.01.2011 and thereafter on 04.03.2011 for curing the defect. In spite of the above, no steps have been taken. It is obvious that, the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting this review petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed.

Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE.

AV /True Copy/ P.A to Judge