Babu v. Ajithakumari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2015/5TH SRAVANA, 1937 RPFC.No. 95 of 2006 ---------------------- M.C 264/2003 of FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT.:

--------------------------------- BABU, S/O.K.BHASKARAN, BABU SADANAM, PARAKKARA, PANTHALAM, THEKEKKARA VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.

BY ADVS.SRI.R.DIVAKARAN SRI.BINOI GEORGE (CHERUKARA) RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS.:

---------------------------------------

1. AJITHAKUMARI, D/O.CHANDRAMATHI MULLASSERIL MEMURIYIL VEEDU, NARANGANAM VILLAGE NARANGANAM WEST MURI, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK.

2. REEYA, AGED 4 YEARS (MINOR), REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AJITHAKUMARI, MULLASSERIL MEMURIYIL VEEDU, NARANGANAM VILLAGE NARAGANAM WEST MURI, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK.

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JUSTINE JACOB.

THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

STU

K.HARILAL, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.(FC) No.95 of 2006 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ==== Dated this the 27th day of July, 2015

ORDER

As per order dated 30.06.2015, the revision petitioner is directed to cure the defect within one week, failing which, this revision petition will stand dismissed. The revision petitioner has not cured the defect within the time. In the above view of the matter, this revision petition will stand dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- K.HARILAL, JUDGE.

stu //True copy// P.A to Judge