Ramesh Kumar V.R. v. Parali Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/17TH POUSHA, 1936 OP(C).No. 26 of 2015 (O) ----------------------------------- ARC 1720/2005 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD ------------ PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- RAMESH KUMAR V.R., AGED 41 YEARS S/O.RAMANKUTTY, VALIYAPRAMBIL HOUSE, ODANUR, PARALI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.SAJU SRI.P.M.SHAMEER RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- PARALI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.6808, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PARALI POST, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678612.

BY ADV. SRI.K..LAKSHMINARAYANAN CAVEATOR THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

OP(C).No. 26 of 2015 (O) ----------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT. P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD PASSED BY THE INSPECTOR FOR ARBITRATION AND EXECUTION COURT PALAKKAD IN ARC 1720/05 DT.14-2-2006.

EXT. P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE EP FILE UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 66 OF CPC BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUB COURT AT PALAKKAD. EXT. P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 23785/08 DT.7-8-2008. EXT. P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCLAMATION SCHEDULE DT.14-8-2008 SUBMITTED BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE DECREE HOLDER BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUB COURT AT PALAKKAD.

EXT. P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCLAMATION OF SALE EP 66/2007 IN ARC 1720/2005 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUB COURT AT PALAKKAD DT.17-1-2011.

EXT. P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP 599/2011 DT.30-5-2014. EXT. P7 :

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCLAMATION OF SA IN EP 66/07 IN ARC 1720/05 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUB COURT AT PALAKKAD DT.NIL. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

P.BHAVADASAN, J.

------------------------------------------------- Original Petition (Civil) No.26 OF 2015 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of January, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

When this original petition was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out that his party is willing to pay the balance decree debt within a period of three weeks.

2. This original petition is disposed of directing the decree holder to submit the balance amount due as per the decree within a period of two weeks from today and thereafter the petitioner will be given three weeks time to pay the same in its entirety. Till then, sale proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Sd/- P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE smp