High Court of KeralaOP(C)/521/2015allowed

Siji v. Cheriyan Varghese

2015-04-08Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/18TH CHAITHRA, 1937 OP(C).No. 521 of 2015 () ------------------------- E.P. NO. 72/2014 IN OS 1463/2012 of SUB COURT, CHAVAKKAD. PETITIONER(S):

------------- SIJI, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O.LATE DHRUVAN, NEDIYEDATH HOUSE, AKG ROAD, PAZHANJI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 542. BY ADVS.SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN SRI.P.T.GIRIJAN SMT.USHA NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S):

-------------- CHERIYAN VARGHESE, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.VARGHESE, KOLADY, VADAKKOOT HOUSE, PORKULAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 542. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL BY ADV. SMT.R.RAJITHA BY ADV. SRI.K.D.SREEVISAKH THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OP(C).No. 521 of 2015 -------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS -------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 27.02.2013 IN O.S.NO.1463/2012 OF THE SUB COURT, THRISSUR.

EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF E.P.NO.72/2014 IN O.S.NO.1463/2012 DATED 16.06.2014 OF THE SUB COURT, CHAVAKKAD.

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE DRAFT SALE PROCLAMATION DATED 16.06.2014 IN E.P.NO.72/2014 IN O.S.NO.1463/2012 OF THE SUB COURT, CHAVAKKAD.

EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 08.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR IN E.P.72/2014 IN O.S.1463/2012 OF THE SUB COURT, CHAVAKKAD.

EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.01.2015 IN E.P.NO.72/2014 IN O.S.NO.1463/2012 OF THE SUB COURT, CHAVAKKAD.

EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE SALE PROCLAMATION DATED 20.01.2015 IN E.P.NO.72/2014 IN O.S.NO.1463/2012 OF THE SUB COURT, CHAVAKKAD.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------

P. BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P.(C). No. 521 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of April, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The only grievance voiced in this Original Petition is that the entire property attached need not be sold for the reason that the value of the property is much more than the amount due to the decree holder.

2. Learned counsel for the decree holder, respondent, before this Court pointed out that the court below may be directed to consider whether the entire property needs to be sold. In the result, this Original Petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the trial court to find out whether the entire property needs to be sold or whether a portion of the property alone needs to be sold to meet the decree debt.

P. BHAVADASAN, sb.

JUDGE