High Court of KeralaOP(C)/731/2015disposed of

Sreelatha Rajeev v. Muthoot Vehicle And Asset Finance Ltd.

2015-06-04Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937 OP(C).No. 731 of 2015 (O) ------------------------------------ EA.2021/2014 IN EP.60/2009 IN ARBITRATION REFERENCE NO.148/2007 OF DISTRICT COURT-III, ERNAKULAM --------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------

1. SREELATHA RAJEEV, AGED 47 YEARS, W/O.RAJEEVKUMAR, SREE NILAYAM, MANNOM.P.O., NORTH PARAVUR-683520.

2. RAJEEVKUMAR, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, SREE NILAYAM, MANNOM.P.O. NORTH PARAVUR-683520.

BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------ MUTHOOT VEHICLE AND ASSET FINANCE LTD.

(FORMER MOTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LTD.) KURIAN TOWERS, BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM KOCHI-18, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS.BABY SUJATHA.

BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OP(C).No. 731 of 2015 (O) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

COPY OF EP.NO.69/2009 ON THE FILE OF DISTRICT COURT-III, ERNAKULAM. P2:

COPY OF COUNTER FILED BY 1ST PETITIONER P3:

COPY OF DRAFT SALE PROCLAMATION.

P4:

COPY OF OBJECTION FILED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE DRAFT SALE PROCLAMATION.

P5:

COPY OF RECEIPTS ISSUED BY RESPONDENT P6:

COPY OF EA.2021/14 FILED BY PETITIONERS P7:

COPY OF ORDER DATED 10/2/15 IN EA.2021/14 IN EP.69/09 IN ARBITRATION REF.NO.148/07.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` O.P.(C) No.731 of 2015 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The matter is referred for mediation. The matter has been amicably settled in mediation, and the mediation settlement agreement has been entered into. The same has been produced. All the terms contained in the mediation settlement agreement are legal. The said mediation settlement agreement is accepted. This OP(Civil) is disposed of in accordance with the mediation settlement agreement, which forms part of this judgment. Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/04/06 // True Copy // PA to Judge