← Library
High Court of KeralaOP(C)/773/2015disposed of

Sulochana v. Sarojini

2015-06-01Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2015/11TH JYAISHTA, 1937 OP(C).No.773 of 2015 (O) ----------------------------------- OS NO.431/2006 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,PALAKKAD. ..

PETITIONER:

------------------- SULOCHANA,W/O.LATE CHENTHAMARAKSHAN, AGED 65 YEARS,KAYTHARAVU KALAM, VANDITHAVALAM P.O.,CHITTUR TALUK,PALAKKAD.

BY ADVS.SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN SMT.SHAMSEERA. C.ASHRAF SRI.T.U.SUJITH KUMAR SMT.ANU JACOB RESPONDENT:

--------------------- SAROJINI,W/O.CHADRAN,AGED 67 YEARS, NEDUVALLIKALAM,OZHIVUPARA,PALLASSENA, CHITTUR TALUK,PALAKKAD - 678 101.

R1 BY ADVS.SRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN SRI.E.RAMACHANDRAN SMT.A.SINDHULAKSHMY SRI.R.UMASANKAR SMT.SINDHU SARAH THOMAS THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: pk

OP(C).No.773 of 2015 (O) ----------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------ EXT.P1:A TRUE COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY DECREE IN ORIGINAL SUIT NUMBER 431/2006 OF THE COURT OF THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF PALAKKAD.

EXT.P2:A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM REPORT DATED MAY 23,2013 FILED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER.

EXT.P3:A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED AUGUST 1, 2013 IN INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NUMBER 1832/2013 IN FINAL DECREE APPLICATION NUMBER 2925/2009 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NUMBER 431/2006 OF THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SUBORDINAT JUDGE, PALAKKAD. EXT.P4:A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED JANUARY 29,2014 IN OPC NUMBER 2994/2013.

EXT.P5:A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED AUGUST 12,2014 OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

................................................................ O.P.(C) No.773 of 2015 ............................................................... Dated this the 1st day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The respondent has entered appearance. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.

2.

The petitioner is entitled to half share in the property. Therefore, the petitioner need only to be burdened with the liability to deposit half the bid amount. The court below is directed to give such a direction to the Commissioner. Condition Nos.5, 6 and 7 in Ext.P5 is modified to the above effect.

With the said directions, this Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/-B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE ul/- / true copy / P.S. to Judge.