K.S.Santhosh v. The Registrar High Court Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/1ST POUSHA, 1937 OP.No. 16048 of 1999 (R) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- 1.

K.S. SANTHOSH, PROCESS SERVER, DISTRICT COURT THODUPUZHA 2.

T.U. SOMAN PILLAI, PORCESS SERVER, SUBORDINATE JUDGE'S COURT, KATTAPPANA 3.

P.N. DASAN, PROCESS SERVER, SUBORDINATE JUDGES COURT KATTAPPANA 4.

JOSEMON CYRIAC, PROCESS SERVER, SUBCOURT, KATTAPPANA 5.

P.S. SUBAIR, PROCESS SERVER, DISTRICT COURT THODUPUZHA BY ADVS.SRI.A.K.AVIRAH SRI.VIJU ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

THE REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM 2.

THE DISTRICT JUDGE, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COURT THODUPUZHA 3.

A.K. AMMINI, DISTRICT COURT THODUPUZHA 4.

K. THANKAN, AMIN, SUBCOURT, KATTAPPANA 5.

A PUSHKARAN, AMIN, MUNSIFF'S COURT DEVIKULAM 6.

P.K. SAROJINI, AMIN, DISTRICT COURT, THODUPUZHA 7.

O.S CHANDRAN, AMIN DISTRICT COURT THODUPUZHA R, BY ADV. SRI.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD (SR.) R, 0 BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. R,2 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M J RAJASREE R1 BY ADV. SRI.BABU PAUL THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O.P NO.16048/1999 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY of the O,M. NO.C3/26665/93 DT 14.3.95 EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE OM NO.C3/26665/93 DT16.10.1995 EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT 9.10.98 EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 24.10.98 EXT.P5: TRUE COPY of the ORDER NO. A1/17/95 DT 25.10.95 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P No. 16048 of 1999 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners in the above original petition sought for promotion over and above the respondents 3 to 7. As of now, many of the petitioners and all the respondents have retired. The petitioners are also said to have been promoted subsequently. In such circumstance, nothing survives in the writ petition and the same is dismissed.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P No. 16048 of 1999 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22nd day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T