High Court of KeralaOP(C)/951/2015disposed of

Dilin M.L v. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd

2015-04-08Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/18TH CHAITHRA, 1937 OP(C).No. 951 of 2015 (O) -------------------------------------- IA.NO.2563/2014 IN OP(ARB) 432/2014 OF DISTRICT COURT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ........

PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- DILIN M.L., 253 A, 5 140, MANIVILASAM, KOOTHALI, VELLARADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 505.

BY ADV. SMT.BINITHA JAMES RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD., (A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956), HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 27-BKC, C-27, G-BLOCK, BANDRA, KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI - MAHARASHTRA-400 051, HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT GROUND FLOOR, S.I. WHITE HEAVEN, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 010, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS MANAGER MR.RENJITH VIJAYAKUMAR. BY ADVS. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI SRI.SEBIN THOMAS SRI.VIVEK V. KANNANKERI SMT.J.KASTHURI SRI.VISHNU BHUVANENDRAN THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

OP(C).No. 951 of 2015 (O) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE OP(ARB) NO.432/2014. EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE I.A.NO.25632014 IN OP(ARB)NO.432/2014. EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 15.1.2015.

EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.9.10.2014 IN IA.NO.2563/2014 IN OP(ARB) NO.432/2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

P.BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P.(C) No.951 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 08th day of April, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out that he is willing to pay the entire arrears as claimed by the respondent to have the vehicle released from the custody of the respondent.

It is made clear that on payment of the entire arrears as on today as claimed by the respondent, the vehicle shall be released forthwith. However, it is also made clear that the petitioner shall continue to pay future instalments within the stipulated time, failing which, the respondent will be entitled to proceed in accordance with law. This petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/- P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE ds //True copy// P.A. to Judge