← Library
High Court of KeralaOP(C)/1125/2015disposed of

Akhila Kerala Viswakarma Mahasaba v. Muraleedharan

2015-09-08Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/17TH BHADRA, 1937 OP(C).No. 1125 of 2015 (O) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 464/2014 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM ------------------------------ PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- AKHILA KERALA VISWAKARMA MAHASABA KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY GOPALAKRISHNAN.

BY ADVS.SRI.C.RAJENDRAN SRI.K.R.RANJITH RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. MURALEEDHARAN VETTATHUKAVU, KARUVA, KANJAVELY P.O. KOLLAM - 691 602.

2. K.R.SURENDRAN, SREERA MANDIRAM, DECENT JUNCTION, THRIKKOVILVATTOM KOLLAM - 691 577.

R1&2 BY ADV. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU R1&2 BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN (MVA) R1&2 BY ADV. SRI.A.R.EASWAR LAL THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OP(C).No. 1125 of 2015 (O) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A NO.1833/2014 IN OS. NO.464/2014 DATED 19/06/2015 OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM. EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPLY UNDER RTI DATED 7/8/2014. EXHIBIT P3: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIVER APPLICATION DATED 21/02/2015.

EXHIBIT P4: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS DATED 21/03/2015.

EXHIBIT P5: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER IN IA NO.1060/2015 IN OS NO.464/2014 DATED 10/4/2015 OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------ R.AV //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P.(C). No.1125 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is the plaintiff. He challenges Ext.P5 order by which his application for appointment of receiver was dismissed.

2.

Heard.

3.

The main reason for dismissing the application was that the suit stood posted for trial. It appears that it is only proper that the trial court is directed to dispose of the case on or before 23.12.2015.

In the result, this O.P is disposed of with a direction to the trial court to dispose of the suit on or before 23.12.2015.

sd/- K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE R.AV //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE