High Court of KeralaOP(C)/1590/2015disposed of

Karthikeyan K. v. State Of Kerala

2015-07-15Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2015/24TH ASHADHA, 1937 OP(C).No. 1590 of 2015 --------------------------------- LB 24/1973 OF TALUK LAND BOARD, PALAKKAD DATED 26-09-2003 .........

PETITIONER(S):

-----------------------

1. KARTHIKEYAN K., AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. THANKAMANI, MANGODE HOUSE, PUDUNAGARAM P.O., PALAKKAD-678 503.

2. BHAVADASAN K., AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNAN, KURAPATHE HOUSE, ALAMPALLAM, KALPATHY P.O., PALAKKAD-678 005.

3. RAVINDRAN K., AGED 63 YEARS, S/O. KANDAN, ARUKUDI HOUSE, KOTTEEKKAD P.O., PALAKKAD-678 732.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR SRI.K.JAGADEESH RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE TALUK LAND BOARD, PALAKKAD-678 582.

3. THE TAHASILDAR, PALAKKAD-678 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.REJI JOSEPH THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

OP(C).No. 1590 of 2015 --------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 : TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.LB.240/73, DTD.23.1.2001, OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

P2 : TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN CRP NO.718/2001, DTD.17.10.2008.

P3 : TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN CRP NO.2574/2002, DTD.18.12.2014.

P4 : TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THANKAMANI, BEFORE THE TALUK LAND BOARD, DTD.28.1.2010.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` O.P.(C) No.1590 of 2015 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 15th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The limited prayer of the petitioners is that they should also be heard in the matter by the Land Board prior to the passing of the final order in the matter. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Land Board has taken a view that the petitioners need not be heard further in the matter. The Taluk Land Board is directed to consider the claims raised by the petitioners and hear them prior to the final disposal of the matter.

With the said observations, this O.P.(Civil) is disposed of.

Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/15/07 // True Copy // PA to Judge