← Library
High Court of KeralaOP(C)/2617/2015allowed

Reji Kumar v. Sathi Dhanapalan

2015-10-30Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/8TH KARTHIKA, 1937 OP(C).No. 2617 of 2015 (O) --------------------------- (AGAINST ORDER DATED 15.9.2015 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, ALAPPUZHA IN IA.NO.3439/2015 IN OS.NO.228/2012) PETITIONER(S)/ADL. DEFENDANTS 5 AND 6:

-------------------------------------------------------------

1. REJI KUMAR AGED 43 YEARS S/O. DHARMAJAN, KATTUNGAL HOUSE, KOMALAPURAM VILLAGE ARYAD PANCHAYATH, AVALOOKKUNU P.O., ALAPUZHA.

2. REMYA W/O. REJI KUMAR, KATTUNGAL HOUSE, KOMALAPURAM VILLAGE ARYAD PANCHAYATH, AVALOOKKUNU P.O., ALAPUZHA. BY ADVS.SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS SMT.E.U.DHANYA RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 4 AND ADL DEFENDANT 7: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. SATHI DHANAPALAN W/O. DHANAPALAN, THARAYIL HOUSE, SOUTH ARYAD MURI KOMALAPURAM VILLAGE, ARYAD PANCHAYATH, ALAPUZHA.

2. ARYAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH KOMALAPURAM, AVALOOKKUNNU P.O., ALAPUZHA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. KUSAN CONVENER, BENEFICIARY COMMITTEE, KUTTIDAYIL HOUSE KOMALAPURAM VILLAGE, ARAYAD PANCHAYATH AVALOOKUNNU P.O., ALAPUZHA.

4. SULOCHANA W/O. DHARMAJAN, KATTUNGAL HOUSE, KOMALAPURAM VILLAGE ARYAD PANCHAYATH, AVALOOKKUNNU P.O., ALAPUZHA.

5. KISHORE DAS PUTHEN VEEDU, KOMALAPURAM VILLAGE, ARYAD PANCHAYATH AVALOOKKUNNU P.O. ALAPUZHA.

6. P.V.DAS PUTHEN VEEDU, KOMALAPURAM VILLAGE, ARYAD PANCHAYATH AVALOOKKUNNU P.O. ALAPUZHA.

THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OP(C).No. 2617 of 2015 (O) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT.P1:-TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS NO 228/2012 EXHIBIT.P2:-TRUE COPY OF WRITTEN STATEMENT IN OS NO 228/2012 EXHIBIT.P3:-TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DTD 11/9/2015 FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF FOR REMOVAL OF THE CASE FROM THE SPECIAL LIST EXHIBIT.P4:-TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DTD 11/9/2015 FOR APPOINTMENT ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER FOR FIXATION AND BOUNDARY EXHIBIT.P5:-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD 15/9/2015 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, ALAPPUZHA IN IA NO 3439/2015 IN OS 228/2012 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL --------------------------------------- R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J --------------------------------- O.P.(C).NO.2617 OF 2015 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of October 2015

J U D G M E N T

------------------- Petitioners are defendants 5 and 6 in OS.228 of 2012 of Munsiff Court, Alappuzha. When the suit came up for trial in list, the first respondent/plaintiff filed an application to appoint a commissioner. The allegation is that the learned Munsiff allowed it even without posting it for the objection of the petitioners. The prayer is to set aside ext.P5 order and to direct the Munsiff to post Ext.P4 application for the petitioners's objection.

2.

Heard.

3.

I am satisfied that the request is reasonable. If the allegation is true, there has been violation of principle of natural justice and provisions in the Civil Rules of Practice.

in the result, this OP is allowed. Ext.P5 order is set aside. The learned Munsiff is directed to post Ext.P4

O.P.(C).NO.2617 OF 2015 application for the objection of the petitioners and to pass order afresh after hearing both parties.

sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge