← Library
High Court of KeralaOP(C)/2714/2015allowed

Johnson v. Sivan

2015-11-12Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937 OP(C).No. 2714 of 2015 (O) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 1791/2012 OF MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA ------------------------ PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- JOHNSON AGED 49 YEARS S/O.KOMBARA KAITHAVALAPPIL OUSEPH KOTANELLUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.

BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- SIVAN, AGED 58 YEARS S/O.CHIRAYIL VELAPPAN, KOTANELLUR VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK-680001.

THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OP(C).No. 2714 of 2015 (O) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS 1791 OF 2012 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA, DATED .9-7-2012. EXT.P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT AND PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN EXT.P1 DATED 7-9-2012. EXT.P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN EXT.P1 DATED 16-32013. EXT.P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND PLAN IN EXT.P1 SUIT DATED 4-6-2015.

EXT.P5 : A TRUE COPY OF IA NO.4952/2015 IN EXT.P1 DATED 20-7-2015. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL -------------------------------------- R.AV //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P.(C)No.2714 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

----------------- Petitioner is the plaintiff in OS.1791 of 2012 on the file of Munsiff, Irinjalakuda. The complaint is that without disposing of Ext.P5 application filed by him for amendment of the plaint the learned Munsiff has posted the case for trial. The prayer is to direct the Munsiff to dispose of Ext.P5 application before the case is tried.

2.

Heard.

3.

I am satisfied that the request is reasonable. In the result this O.P is allowed. The learned Munsiff is directed to dispose of Ext.P5 application before the case is taken up for trial.

sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge