Ingo Remigus v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/13TH PHALGUNA, 1936 OP(Crl.).No. 50 of 2015 (Q) ---------------------------- CC.NO.2652/2013 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - I, PALAKKAD PETITIONER :- --------------------- INIGO REMIGUS, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. MANUEL RAJ, 283 LIG COLONY, ANNA NAGAR, MADURAI - 625 020.
BY ADV. SRI.NIDHI BALACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS :- ---------------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
2. VIJAYAN RAGHAVAN, S/O. LATE RAGHAVA MENON, RESIDING AT NO.3/32, SREE NIVAS, MIN NAGAR, 2ND STREET, KUNIAYAMUTHUR, COIMBATORE - 8.
R1 BY SMT.S.HYMA, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(Crl.).No. 50 of 2015 (Q) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :- ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.479/13 OF WALAYAR POLICE STATION.
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.479/13 OF WALAYAR POLICE STATION.
EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - 7, COIMBATORE.
EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE DIARY EXTRACT IN CC 2652/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - I, PALAKKAD. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL ----------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
P.UBAID, J.
------------------------------------------------------------ O.P.(Crl)No.50 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner herein is the de facto complainant in C.C.No.2652 of 2013 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - I, Palakkad. He seeks a direction for expeditious trial and disposal of the said case in view of the another matter pending between the parties before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-VII, Coimbatore. As required by the Court, the learned Magistrate submitted a report regarding the present stage of the case. There is report that the learned Magistrate has already framed charge against the accused on 18.10.2014, that the case now stands posted for evidence on 02.06.2015, and that if the presence of witnesses is secured without delay, the case can be disposed of within six months.
In the above situation, I do not find the necessity of direction for a time bond disposal. The report submitted
O.P.(Crl)No.50 of 2015 by the learned Magistrate in this regard, that the case can be disposed of within six months is recorded and this Original Petition is closed.
Sd/- P.UBAID JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE