Ragesh Manu v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MAY 2015/15TH VAISAKHA, 1937 OP(Crl.).No. 137 of 2015 (Q) ----------------------------- CC 1869/2013 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHAVAKKAD. ...........

PETITIONER:

------------------- RAGESH MANU, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.DR. RADHAKRISHNAN, SANTHIMADOM, THEKKENALUVAZHI, N.PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 680 101.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GURUVAYOOR POLICE STATION, PIN - 680101.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.ABDUL RAHMAN THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

OP(Crl.).No. 137 of 2015 (Q) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHBITI P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE IN C.C NO 1870/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE JFCM-1 CHAVAKKAD.

EXHBITI P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE IN CC NO 1955/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE JFCM-1 CHAVAKKAD.

EXHBITI P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE IN C.C NO 1810/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE JFCM-1 CHAVAKKAD.

EXHBIIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE IN C.C NO 71/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE JFCM-1,CHAVAKKAD.

EXHBIIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE IN C.C NO 2019/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE JFCM-1 CHAVAKKAD.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

P.UBAID, J.

~~~~~~~~~~ O.P (Crl) No.137 of 2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 5th May, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner herein is involved as accused in twelve cases. Now he wants to surrender before the learned Magistrate. His apprehension is that the learned Magistrate will insist on production of different sets of sureties. The legal position is covered by a decision of this Court. What is important is not the number of sureties, but their solvency to the extent fixed by the trial court for bond in all the cases. The petitioner can very well surrender before the learned Magistrate, place the decision of this Court before the learned Magistrate, and if the two sureties are really solvent to the extent of the bond imposed by the learned Magistrate in the twelve cases, he will be released on the bond of those sureties.

With these observations, this Original Petition is closed.

Sd/- P.UBAID JUDGE ma