Ramai Radhakrishnan v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MAY 2015/25TH VAISAKHA, 1937 OP(Crl.).No. 146 of 2015 (Q) ----------------------------- CC. NO.1870/2013, CC. NO.1955/2013, CC. NO.1810/2013 & CC. NO.2019/2013 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, CHAVAKKAD. .......

PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- MRS.RAMANI RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 62, W/O.DR.RADHAKRISHNAN, SANDHIMADOM, THEKKENALUVAZHI, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GURUVAYOOR POLICE STATION, PIN-680 101.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.K. JAYAKUMAR.

THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

OP(Crl.).No. 146 of 2015 (Q) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1 :

TRUE COPY OF CHARGE IN CC.NO.1870/2013 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, CHAVAKKAD.

P2 :

TRUE COPY OF CHARGE IN CC.NO.1955/2013 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, CHAVAKKAD.

P3 :

TRUE COPY OF CHARGE IN CC.NO.1810/2013 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, CHAVAKKAD.

P4 :

TRUE COPY OF CHARGE IN CC.NO.2019/2013 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, CHAVAKKAD.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

P.UBAID, J.

~~~~~~~~~~ O.P(Crl.) No.146 of 2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 15th day of May, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioner herein is involved in thirteen cases. Now, he wants to surrender before the learned Magistrate. His apprehension is that the learned Magistrate will insist on production of different sets of sureties. The legal position is covered by a decision of this Court. The petitioner can very well cite the said decision before the learned Magistrate and obtain orders. What is important is not the number of the sureties, but their solvency to the extent fixed by the trial court for bond in all the cases. The petitioner can very well surrender before the learned Magistrate, place the decision of this Court before the learned Magistrate, and if the two sureties are really solvent to the extent of the bond imposed by the learned magistrate in the thirteen cases, he will be released on the bond of those sureties. With these observations this original petition is closed. Sd/- P.UBAID JUDGE vdv