Sreeji Gopal v. Rekha Sreeji

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 OP(Crl.).No. 179 of 2015 (Q) --------------------------------------- MC 35/2015 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHANGANACHERRY ----------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------

1. SREEJI GOPAL, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.GOPALANACHARI, SREEDARSH HOUSE, PULLEPPADY, KARTHIKKADAVU ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682017.

2. GOPALANACHARI, AGED 65 YEARS, SREEDARSH HOUSE, PULLEPPADY, KARTHIKKADAVU ROAD ERNAKULAM, PIN 682017.

3. VANAJA GOPAL, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O.GOPALANACHARI, SREEDARSH HOUSE, PULLEPPADY, KARTHIKKADAVU ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682017.

4. JIJA INDURAJ.M.B, AGED 34 YEARS, W/O.INDURAJ, SREEDARSH HOUSE, PULLEPPADY KARTHIKKADAVU ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682017.

BY ADVS.SRI.PRASUN.S SRI.PAUL MATHEW (PERUMPILLIL) SRI.P.V.SREENIJIN SMT.K.B.SONY SRI.PRAMOD DAS LOHYA RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- REKHA SREEJI, AGED 29 YEARS D/O.K.C.RADHAKRISHNAN, "AARADHIKA", PUZHAVATH, CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN 686101. THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

OP(Crl.).No. 179 of 2015 (Q) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE MC.NO.35/2015 PREFERRED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT I, CHANGANASSERY DATED 11.05.2015 P2:

THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.05.2015 IN BA.NO.2861/2015 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT P3:

THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE OP.NO.1103/2015 PREFERRED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

----------------------------- O.P(Crl).No.179 Of 2015 --------------------------------- th day of June, 2015.

Dated this the 24

J U D G M E N T

Sri.S.Prasun, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that it is learnt that the impugned Ext.P1 proceedings have been withdrawn by the respondent herein and that therefore this O.P(Crl) is not being pressed by the petitioner with liberty to initiate appropriate action if the need still subsists.

In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner the O.P(Crl) is closed as not pressed with the above said liberty. ALEXANDER THOMAS, Judge.

bkn/-