Sailesh Kumar v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/26TH BHADRA, 1937 OP(Crl.).No. 214 of 2015 (Q) ----------------------------- MP 1429/2014 IN MC 39/2013 FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR --------------- PETITIONER :

----------------- SAILESH KUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAN NAIR, 9F, HEERA GARDENS, SEAPORT AIRPORT ROAD, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM-682301. BY ADVS.SRI.SUNIL N.SHENOI SRI.S.VISHNU (TRIPUNITHURA) RESPONDENTS :

----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA. REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM PIN - 682301.

2. SUBHA, D/O. CHANDRASEKHARA PANICKER, MAMKULAM MANA, NEAR GAYATHRI TUITION CENTRE, KOLAZHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680020. R1 BY PUBLIC PROPRIETOR SMT. SAREENA GEORGE R2 BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN BY ADV. SRI.LEYO SEBASTIAN THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

OP(Crl.).No. 214 of 2015 (Q) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

P1:

COPY OF THE MP NO. 1429/2014 ON THE FILES OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. P2:

COPY OF OBJECTION FILED IN MP NO. 1429/2014, ON THE FILES OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR.

P3:

COPY OF THE ORDER OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR DT 20/4/2015 IN MP 1429/2014 IN MC 39/2013.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TREU COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` O.P.(Crl.) No.214 of 2015 Q ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 17th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ An amount of ₹3,500/- per month was ordered by the court below as interim maintenance to the 2nd respondent herein. She is the wife and the petitioner is the husband. According to the petitioner, the 2nd respondent is gainfully employed. Those matters have to be established through evidence in the matter. So far, MC.39/2013 of the Family Court, Thrissur has not been disposed of. 2.

On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, this Court does not find anything to interfere with the interim arrangement made by the court below. Let the interim maintenance be paid to the 2nd respondent as ordered by the court below.

O.P.(Crl.).214/2015 : 2 :

The court below shall dispose of MC.39/2013 along with the connected original petitions, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

O.P.(Crl.) is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/17/09 // True Copy // PA to Judge