High Court of KeralaOP(Crl.)/374/2015dismissed

Irumbadasseri Abdul Nasar v. Meharunneesa Chenattukuzhiyil

2015-11-06Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/15TH KARTHIKA, 1937 OP(Crl.).No. 374 of 2015 (Q) ----------------------------- MC 449/2014 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM ------------ PETITIONER/RESPONDENT :

---------------------------------------- IRUMBADASSERI ABDUL NASAR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. ALIKUTTY, MELEPARAMBU HOUSE, NEDIYIRUPPU, NEDIYIRUPPU P.O., KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS :

-------------------------------------------

1. MEHARUNNEESA CHENATTUKUZHIYIL, AGED 38 YEARS, D/O. ALIKUTTY, KOZHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MONGAM KONDOTTY - 673 638.

2. MUHILHA (MINOR), AGED 9 YEARS, D/O. IRUMBADASSERI ABDUL NASAR, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER 1ST PETITIONER MEHARUNNEESA CHENATTUKUZHIYIL, KOZHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MONGAM, KONDOTTY-673 638. THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OP(Crl.).No. 374 of 2015 (Q) ----------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE REGISTERED LAWYER NOTICE DTD.22.3.2014. P2 :

COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION IN OP NO.245 OF 2014. P3 :

COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.8.7.2014 IN OP NO.245 OF 2014. P4 :

COPY OF THE PETITION IN MC NO.449 OF 2014.

P5 :

COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT IN MC NO.449 OF 2014. P6 :

COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.4.9.2015 IN MC NO.449 OF 2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

====================== O.P.(Crl.). No. 374 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 6th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The interim order passed by the Family Court, Malappuram; whereby an amount of ₹2,500/- per month is ordered as interim maintenance to the wife and an amount of ₹1,500/- per month is ordered for the child as interim maintenance, is under challenge.

2. On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the entire matter, I do not find anything to interfere with the said order passed by the court below. Matters being so, this O.P.(Crl.) is devoid of merits and is only to dismissed, and I do so.

In the result, this O.P.(Crl.) is dismissed.

Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA JUDGE DSV/6/11/15 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge